New Tariffs on $300bn of Chinese Goods Inbound – Huawei and Rare Earths in Play?

This is not investment communication. The author has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. WCCF TECH INC has a disclosure and ethics policy.

Equally President Trump lays the groundwork for the side by side round of tariffs on Communist china which can be imposed no earlier than the 24th of June, it'southward time to examine the wider mural in what is moving beyond a trade state of war and into a technology common cold state of war which is i of the major facets driving the trade hostilities betwixt the two countries.

It's worth keeping in mind that the trade war is the end issue of a long term building of tension between the US and Red china. Although many people have been critical of Trump'southward reasoning for firing the starting gun on the current state of affairs (the dollar imbalance between imports and exports has always been a rather meaningless measure given the ultimate accrual of much of the value chain of technology to US companies), both Republicans and Democrats have long held major concerns around Chinese trade practices.

The Real Problem – China Forced Technology Transfer and the Search for Geopolitical Potency

There are numerous genuine problems which do exist with Chinese economic and merchandise policy even so and these are the point of what is going on at present. China has made a large bargain about snazzy programs, particularly the Made in Cathay 2025 plan which aims to reduce the state'south reliance on foreign technology by promoting dwelling house-grown tech, along with the Belt and Route Initiative which aims to build upwards the developing earth with major infrastructure projects to promote economic ties in a mod day Silk Road promoting Chinese goods and trade.

These schemes formalise much of the consequence which the west has with Chinese economic practices, particularly that companies which seek access to Chinese markets and consumers must typically form joint ventures with local firms aimed at unofficially promoting engineering transfer of valuable intellectual property. Communist china now has its own companies which can produce x86, ARM and other processing units along with pretty much owning the supercomputing meridian 500 list with 229 of the systems beingness Chinese (the U.s.a. is in second place with 108 as of Nov 2018 although it does currently hold both beginning and 2d identify).

Where we are now – Escalating Tensions and Chinese Corporate Targets

The loftier profile topics are obviously tariffs, however it'south besides articulate that the trade state of war has moved beyond simply escalating these on each-other. Last year, the US targeted ZTE after finding information technology guilty of breaching sanctions against Islamic republic of iran and Democratic people's republic of korea, effectively banning US companies from doing business with the firm. The obvious and immediate result was effectively the short term death of ZTE until it was thrown on to the table equally a bargaining chip in the trade state of war between the ii countries with the US accepting a fine and corporate reorganisation as acceptable to allow the firm to start its business organisation again.

Having been successful hither, information technology's clear at present that the US is pursuing a similar strategy with its latest targeting of Huawei, the undisputed precious stone in the crown of Chinese applied science firms. However Huawei has plainly non been standing idly by since it saw what happened to ZTE last year and has been both stockpiling chips likewise as working to reduce its reliance on US software and hardware with its own HiSilicon chip unit working to design its own Kirin SoCs to further reduce its reliance on US hardware.

The difficulty is that the Us placing Huawei on its entity list has resulted in some non-United states of america companies such as ARM (now owned by SoftBank TYO:9984) also stopping working with Huawei and its subsidiaries like HiSilicon. It'due south worth noting here though that although these companies may stop working with Huawei and other Chinese companies the US names, the ultimate objective of Red china was that information technology wouldn't need these companies anyway.

Clearly however, Prc would rather have been in a position to just stop using strange engineering when information technology decided it no longer needed it rather than have access to foreign technology be forcibly removed from it and it remains to be seen whether Huawei and other Chinese companies are ready for a protracted trade war which sees critical technology no longer accessible. Even if the Fabricated in China 2025 plan was successful, there is still another half-dozen years to go until it was supposed to come to fruition and then information technology is likely that the withdrawal of foreign technology will result in some pain for China.

It's not merely silicon we're looking at here though. It's worth noting that this forced intellectual property transfer is happening in China beyond industries with the notable example being automotive and well-nigh major international auto manufacturers of importance having some articulation venture with a Chinese car visitor including all the majors such as Volkswagen, Ford, GM, Toyota, Mercedes, Jaguar Land Rover, Peugeot and others all attempting not to paw over the critical secrets to their Chinese "partners" which allow them access to sell to Chinese consumers.

At present we have a US tech startup CNEX claiming that Huawei has been stealing its trade secrets in what is probable to become one of numerous lawsuits against the company to exam the waters as to how difficult it volition be to prove the transfer of intellectual belongings against Chinese firms. For its role, Huawei is likewise suing CNEX challenge IP theft. The US manifestly has a judiciary which is designed to exist independent of the other arms of government and although the firm is small, the lawsuits will be interesting to follow with the trial for both cases set to kick off on the 3rd of June.

Where Next? Deals, Lawsuits, WTO and Rare Earths?

It'due south worth keeping in mind, although the US can cutting off businesses from working with Chinese entities it doesn't like, this is a legal mechanism, not a technical one. So although ARM may not speak to HiSilicon anymore or licence its newer designs to the firm for use, this doesn't stop HiSilicon from continuing to blueprint its own chips. It simply stops them from licencing ARM designs and getting back up from them in doing and then. This does mean that the time may come when HiSilicon faces lawsuits of its own for using ARM technology without a licence for doing so, the difficulty will exist in actually using a lawsuit to make Huawei or any of its units terminate doing what it'due south doing and it's an important stardom to make. For his function, President Trump has made information technology clear that the situation with Huawei is at present up for negotiation as part of a wider trade bargain. Whether this gets taken upwards or not probably depends at least in part on how self-reliant Huawei can really exist.

Realistically, if China wishes to proceed pursuing its current course, there is no mode that the U.s.a. tin can cease information technology in the short term other than by making life very difficult for the Chinese and hoping that the populace in China becomes disgruntled plenty with its leadership as to finish it pursuing the current course of activeness. President Xi's recent stirring of nationalistic feelings with calls for a new long march in the confront of American aggression are seen by many as testing the waters for pushing its populace to stand house with it and support Chinese companies and products while the trade war gets worked out of the United states' political landscape, although there is bipartisan support on the surface for the current activeness confronting Mainland china, the Democrats may look to capitalise on any economic weakness which results from the trade state of war.

President Trump is right to note that the Chinese may be hoping to negotiate terms with a President that comes after him (potentially a Democrat) who may exist non as ambitious on the terms of a deal. Trump of course has a maximum of six years or so left in the White Firm. There volition unquestionably be a brunt put on the Chinese economic system if the current escalations continue, however China is not without cards of its ain to play although information technology has mostly played its minor cards and the ones remaining are potentially unpalatable for several reasons.

Tariffs on the United states of america are the small-scale cards in question, it'due south fair to say that these are reaching a point where it can't do much more since the US obviously imports more from People's republic of china than vice versa, the United states can continue to impose tariffs on additional goods long after the Chinese have run out of things to practise the same on. However the latest proposal for tariffs the US may impose in June does incorporate a notable omission and unsurprisingly, this is rare earths.

As nosotros covered in our exclusive slice regarding decoupling the Western tech industry from Red china in December (here), China holds the largest reserves of rare earths in the world. As well equally having the largest reserves, it'southward likewise the largest producer and estimates put its production at anywhere between fourscore% and 95% of global supply. Although some may argue that this isn't a large deal, because rare earths simply aren't that rare, this misunderstands the problem.

As with oil, the difficulty with rare earths isn't that they're running out, the difficulty is that CHEAP oil is running out (environmental concerns aside). While information technology is certainly possible that given enough time to absorb a short term supply stupor, the globe would adjust and be able to ramp up product in locations other than Prc, operations which mine and refine hundreds of thousands of tonnes per twelvemonth don't jump upwardly overnight and when they do they tend to toll more since we can safely presume that marketplace efficiencies have driven the production to Cathay in the get-go place due to information technology being the cheapest place to reliably produce them. As such, yes information technology doesn't mean that we won't have electronics products anymore which rely on rare earths to make them, however it is likely that the toll of those products would go up if they were to exist tariffed or subjected to export controls on a large scale, leading to higher production costs, lower profit margins and therefore worse corporate performance, translating into a deteriorating stock marketplace.

The prospect of this has been raised afterward a visit past President Xi to a Chinese rare-world facility last week which was widely seen as a nod to the fact that this is a card China could theoretically play at some indicate if the trade state of war escalates further.

Additionally, some are now starting to speculate that China could also begin retaliatory actions against some United states of america companies. The spectre of major western companies losing access to China's well-nigh 1.iv billion consumers isn't a pretty one to contemplate. Equally the merchandise war ramped up concluding year, engineering stocks suffered in a large way. Since then, reassurance from the US in the shape of what is being referred to every bit the "Trump put" has prevailed to allow the marketplace to recover most of its Q4 2018 losses. The Trump put refers to the fact that the President will always act to support the stock marketplace and if necessary, bike out administration bigwigs to calm the markets and keep things on an even keel. However concerned statements in recent earnings reports from major technology companies such as Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL), NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) and others as to softening demand for their products in People's republic of china has seen investor appetite for companies deemed to take large exposure to the trade war falling away.

Cathay remains cautious thus far to target western companies directly in the way which the U.s.a. has done to Chinese companies like ZTE and at present Huawei but there is no uncertainty that if Mainland china were to close off access to its markets to some of these companies, it would signify a major escalation in the trade state of war and the stock marketplace would suffer. The likelihood is the President would lay the blame for this at the door of his beleaguered Fed Chair Jerome Powell for raising interest rates, but in the outcome information technology happens, information technology would probably be a combination of both of these things along with other factors.

The other bill of fare which China holds is its massive holdings of U.s.a. government debt. Currently sitting at over $1.2 trillion, concerns were stoked this month when data showed that Cathay sold about $twenty billion of them in March, leading to concerns that China could attempt to weaponise the holding. Something which would cause the Usa a reasonable degree of economic discomfort no doubt, but likewise an unappealing possibility for Beijing.

Wrapping Up

The difficulty with Mainland china's cards is that if information technology plays them, they will hurt China too. The US cards existence played are no dissimilar in that they do hurt Americans in the form of higher costs for some consumer goods, lower revenues for some industries that rely on People's republic of china and inflation but these are incremental changes which aren't going to slap consumers in the face like if China banned Apple from doing business there anymore and you just weren't able to buy a new iPhone. The cost of an iPhone going upward in the US will mean consumers have less coin to spend on other items or they'll mayhap upgrade less frequently but the product itself would still exist available.

Similarly, Communist china earns a lot of money from its rare earths product. Banning the export wholesale could prove problematic for the Chinese economy, as well as drive up costs and generate short to medium term supply headaches for western firms in need of them.

As for weaponising U.s. government bonds? Well, the Chinese holding is currently worth $1.2 trillion. Dumping them on the market would absolutely injure the US economy simply at the aforementioned time, the value of the property would plummet while the auction was going on. You tin can't simply dump a trillion dollars in T-notes on the market place and expect people to just purchase information technology all at the current price.

Then what nosotros're left with is a semi-limbo country while China tries to figure out how best to answer. Given Trump's insistence that any deal will non outcome in the immediate lifting of tariffs until China changes its laws in the way the U.s. is looking for and ensures compliance with the terms of the bargain, it may simply be in People's republic of china'due south best interests to but tone things down and play a waiting game. The stock market is definitely slowing down as we would expect this late in the economical bike.

Government and central bank firepower to keep the party going is almost exhausted with tax cuts running out, involvement rates still at global tape lows and cardinal bank remainder sheets stuffed full of quantitative easing positions it'due south hard to see what more than the global economy tin can do to proceed the party going. Tech stocks with Red china/United states trade war exposure take suffered, non simply the headline names but also the likes of smaller but still important suppliers such as Skyworks (NASDAQ:SWKS), Qorvo (NASDAQ:QRVO), Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO), Lumentum (NASDAQ:LITE) and others have shed equally much as 25% of their marketplace cap since tensions increased with the latest round of tariffs. Chinese publicly listed companies are too suffering such as Tencent (HKG:0700).

Overall however, information technology is felt that the likelihood is the Usa and the West take stronger economies than Prc and although they will absolutely bear some of the burden of a merchandise war, they will also reap some benefits with probable greater merchandise between Western countries the result. What most models predicting this don't take into account however is that this could be the trigger for a global economic downturn since both the US and Red china maintain big economies which bulldoze much global consumer demand.

This much said, a recession is likely overdue given that nosotros are currently in the midst of the longest bull market place in history. It is hard to come across how either side tin climb down from the current state of the trade war with what has currently been ready out, for our part, we'll continue to talk over the state of the technology market with an increasing focus on some of the tech coming out of Cathay every bit the trade war plays out in the coming years.