Benchmarks: Battlefield 3, Crysis 3

Examination the GTX 780 Crack JetStream in Battlefield 3 reveals that it is in fact able to match and even flap the GTX Titan. At 2560x1600, information technology was 5% faster at 71.2fps, which besides made it 10% faster than a standard GTX 780.

The inning time performance of the GTX 780 Superintendent JetStream too put information technology slenderly forward of the Titan in Battlefield 3, taking just 16.5ms between frames at 2560x1600.

Using three monitors we establish that a pair of GTX 780 Super JetStreams in SLI could deliver 34.3fps at 7680x1600, which was surprisingly fair-and-square 2fps much the HD 7970 GHz Edition card game. Notwithstandin, while the three-fold GTX 780 Super JetStreams were just 7% quicker than the 7970 GHz Variation in Crossfire, the setup still outpaced standard 780s by 8% and a GTX Titan by 47%.

Interestingly, at 2560x1600 the HD 7970 GHz Variant Crossfire cards were faster on the average between frames than the Super JetStream SLI cards, taking just 66.7ms versus 78.3ms.

Once again, we see that the GTX 780 Super JetStream is able to outpace the GTX Titan, this time by 9%, which works out to be 14% quicker than a standard GTX 780.

The human body time results align with what we saw from the frames per second testing, as the GTX 780 Extremely JetStream was 9% faster than the GTX Titan and 17% faster than a normal GTX 780.

Unlike what we saw when examination Field 3, the GTX 780 Superintendent JetStream SLI cards provided a significant functioning gain over the HD 7970 GHz Edition Crossfire cards -- 78% more performance precisely, while delivering 14% more frames than standard GTX 780s and 84% much the GTX Titan.

When information technology came to triple monitor frame time performance, Palit's cards remained on top taking 70.6ms between frames, while the casebook GTX 780s took 77.9ms and the HD 7970 GHz Variant Crossfire card game 90.6ms.